| To: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: impressive throughput on 2.5.73 |
| From: | Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 02 Jul 2003 20:20:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Scott Feldman <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3F039BE1.2080008@us.ibm.com> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <1057193766.31286.843.camel@nighthawk> <3F039BE1.2080008@us.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 19:58, Nivedita Singhvi wrote: > Nice numbers :). In addition to NAPI, would be nice to > stick in more adapters. Any idea why __wake_up should be > so expensive on the client side? NAPI seems to degrade throughput down to ~80MB/sec, but the interrupt rate doesn't change. I'm going to put some debugging in and makes sure that it's kicking in properly. -- Dave Hansen haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: impressive throughput on 2.5.73, Nivedita Singhvi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Disconnecting a connected UDP socket, Shibu LKML |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: impressive throughput on 2.5.73, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | RE: impressive throughput on 2.5.73, Dave Hansen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |