| To: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance tests |
| From: | Martin Josefsson <gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Jun 2003 22:17:14 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030617200721.GA25773@netnation.com> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <20030616.160856.35828947.davem@redhat.com> <20030616232750.GD18484@netnation.com> <20030616234937.GE18484@netnation.com> <20030617.085921.28790392.davem@redhat.com> <16111.18107.699689.704597@robur.slu.se> <20030617200721.GA25773@netnation.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 22:07, Simon Kirby wrote: > > Also think Simon used only /32 routes... I took "real" Internet-routing > > and made a script so it can be used for experiments. I can make it > > available. > > Yes, I found that area less interesting since Dave M. fixed the hash > buckets. But yes, the prefix scanning will slow it down some. > > Whoa. Uhm. A lot. I should compare with 2.4 again to see what's going > on here. > size IN: hit tot mc no_rt bcast madst masrc OUT: hit tot > mc GC: tot ignored goal_miss ovrf > 17929 13 214343 0 0 0 0 163822 0 0 > 0 50521 50519 0 0 Did you have rp_filter enabled? Looks like it. -- /Martin |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance tests, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch for common networking error messages, Janice M Girouard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance tests, Simon Kirby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance tests, Simon Kirby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |