| To: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:12:20 -0700 |
| Cc: | tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pfeather@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131553510.10203-100000@gp> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131553510.10203-100000@gp> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 |
Quoting todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: > dave, all, > > not sure i understand what you're proposing, but while we're at it, > why not also make the api for apps to allocate a buffer in userland > that (for nics that support it) the nic can dma directly into? it I believe thats exactly what David was referring to - reverse direction sendfile() so to speak.. > seems likely notification that the buffer was used would have to > travel through the kernel, but it would be nice to save the > interrupts altogether. However, I dont think what youre saving are interrupts as much as the extra copy, but I could be wrong.. thanks, Nivedita |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |