| To: | "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 06 Sep 2002 21:29:25 +0100 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, gh@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <61930391.1031313088@[10.10.2.3]> |
| References: | <20020906.113611.102227888.davem@redhat.com> <61930391.1031313088@[10.10.2.3]> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 19:51, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > The secondary point is "what are customers doing in the field?" > (not what *should* they be doing ;-)). Moreover, I think the > Apache + Tux combination has been fairly well beaten on already > by other people in the past, though I'm sure it could be done > again. Tux has been proven in the field. A glance at some of the interesting porn domain names using it would show that 8) |
| Previous by Date: | New York Remembrance 911, Irmingard Anna |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |