| To: | Troy Wilson <tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Sep 2002 15:39:31 -0700 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200209052211.g85MBFdm099387@tempest.prismnet.com> |
| References: | <200209052211.g85MBFdm099387@tempest.prismnet.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 |
Quoting Troy Wilson <tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Do you have any stats from the hardware that could show > > retransmits etc; > > I'll gather netstat -s after runs with and without TSO enabled. > Anything else you'd like to see? Troy, this is pointing out the obvious, but make sure you have the before stats as well :)... > > have you tested this with zero copy as well (sendfile) > > Yes. My webserver is Apache 2.0.36, which uses sendfile for > anything > over 8k in size. But, iirc, Apache sends the http headers using > writev. SpecWeb99 doesnt execute the path that might benefit the most from this patch - sendmsg() of large files - large writes going down.. thanks, Nivedita |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |