| To: | Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | IPv6 RFC2292, 1883 and 2460 (was: RFC2292(bis)) |
| From: | Andras Kis-Szabo <kisza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 20 May 2002 11:55:27 +0200 |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi,
The RFC2292 based on the RFC1883 (and the Linux network (api/libc level)
implementation, too).
The RFC1883 obsolated by the RFC2460.
The Type0 routing header has changed between the two version: the S/L
bits were removed from it. (Changes 01.3) (And the address limit was
deleted, too)
Do the other implementations support the S/L bits?
(The current Netfilter implementation based on the RFC2460.)
regards
kisza
--
Andras Kis-Szabo Security Development, Design and Audit
-------------------------/ Zorp, NetFilter and IPv6
kisza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx /-----Member of the BUTE-MIS-SEARCHlab------>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC2292(bis) checksum support, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | System crash in tcp_fragment(), george anzinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Usage of skb->cb and dev->xmit_lock, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | System crash in tcp_fragment(), george anzinger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |