| To: | "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port) |
| From: | "Kyle C Quest" <kquest@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:09:32 -0400 |
| Cc: | <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210231905280.1533-100000@netcore.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > I'm just curious... what happened to the generic option, SO_ONEFAMILY, that > > would replace > > the need for IPV6_V6ONLY? > > This kind of thing is only applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 (and badly even > there), there is no use trying to generalize it -- the idea was discarded. > I see... Thanks for the info |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |