| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices |
| From: | "Bas Bloemsaat" <bloemsaa@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 2003 22:07:27 +0200 |
| Cc: | <dang@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <skraw@xxxxxxxxxx>, <willy@xxxxxxxxx>, <carlosev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <layes@xxxxxxxxx>, <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030820150110.15623A-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> I don't think anyone is asking for a change in the default behaviour > (although my point about breaking modules does apply), people would be > satisfied, even ecstatic, if we had a simple way (flag) to set to make > Linux work without setting /proc filters, using arpfilter, applying source > routes (David's suggestion) and generally jumping through hoops. Agree! Just a flag (ARP_ISOLATED, default to 0) in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*? The default behaviour of the current (and future kernels) stays as it is now, so it doesn't break for anyone, and a lot of people (including me :) benefit from a much easier setup. No need to implement a whole hidden scenario either. Regards, Bas |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Bill Davidsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RFC][2.4 PATCH] source address selection for ARP requests, Willy Tarreau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Bill Davidsen |
| Next by Thread: | Discussion fucking closed WAS(Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |