netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization

To: <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization
From: "Atul Sabharwal" <iamatul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 22:57:05 -0700
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <bridge@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050526110425.27590eb8@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net><20050526.144638.71091166.davem@davemloft.net><20050526154857.3cb34d11@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050526.155401.18310361.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I have a question about using the 802.1d driver with a switch. I have a managed switch
which connects to the Xscale MAC using a Reverse MII interface.


It seems that the 802.1d bridge puts the interface into promiscuous mode and needs multiple
ethernet devices to work with. Can it work with a single ethernet device which is connected
to a BCM5338 ( broadcomm 8 port switch chip ).


I understand that I would have to change the STP configuration component to write to the
broadcomm chip.


The chip supports direct memory mapped I/O of BPDU's using polled xmite/recieve using
a SPI interface. Since I use a soft SPI stack, I cannot go faster than 2MHz. Besides this
is a serial interface.


Suggestion, comments on both choices are highly appreciated. I am working in a custom
enviornment with main objective of detecting loops in a cascade of switches. The physical
interconnect of the switches could be linear, tree, star or graph topology.


Also, the spanning tree needs to reconverge when switches are connected/disconnected.
Since there are no interrupts from the BCM5338, most of the implementation would be
based of polling. Maybe, a forwarding delay of 5s should work as this is a LAN environment.


--
Atul
Linux Engineer



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>