| To: | <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization |
| From: | "Atul Sabharwal" <iamatul@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 May 2005 22:57:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <bridge@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050526110425.27590eb8@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net><20050526.144638.71091166.davem@davemloft.net><20050526154857.3cb34d11@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050526.155401.18310361.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
I have a question about using the 802.1d driver with a switch. I have a
managed switch which connects to the Xscale MAC using a Reverse MII interface. It seems that the 802.1d bridge puts the interface into promiscuous mode and needs multiple ethernet devices to work with. Can it work with a single ethernet device which is connected to a BCM5338 ( broadcomm 8 port switch chip ). I understand that I would have to change the STP configuration component to write to the broadcomm chip. The chip supports direct memory mapped I/O of BPDU's using polled xmite/recieve using a SPI interface. Since I use a soft SPI stack, I cannot go faster than 2MHz. Besides this is a serial interface. Suggestion, comments on both choices are highly appreciated. I am working in a custom enviornment with main objective of detecting loops in a cascade of switches. The physical interconnect of the switches could be linear, tree, star or graph topology. Also, the spanning tree needs to reconverge when switches are connected/disconnected. Since there are no interrupts from the BCM5338, most of the implementation would be based of polling. Maybe, a forwarding delay of 5s should work as this is a LAN environment. -- Atul Linux Engineer |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [ANNOUNCE] Neterion(S2io) 10GbE Xframe Programming Manual posted, Leonid Grossman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Network driver test suite (part 2), Michael Renzmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |