| To: | "'Jeff Garzik'" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/12] S2io: cosmetic changes |
| From: | "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:10:59 -0700 |
| Cc: | "'Francois Romieu'" <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx>, <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx>, <rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx>, <alicia.pena@xxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <418181D9.5010603@pobox.com> |
| Reply-to: | <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jeff, Looks like outlook client is garbling some of the patch. We'll try to send using different client, but can you pls try with -l option on all the patches and see if it applies cleanly ? Thanks for your patience. Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 4:34 PM To: ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx Cc: 'Francois Romieu'; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx; leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx; raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx; rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx; alicia.pena@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/12] S2io: cosmetic changes With this new resend, I tried with both my automated scripts, and applying manually as well. All attempts succeed on patches #1 and #2, but fail on #3 - #12. If I manually add the "-l" argument to patch(1), then patch #3 succeeds. That implies that somewhere in your process, whitespace in your patches is getting corrupted. Jeff |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: rcv_wnd = init_cwnd*mss, Prasanna Meda |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [XFRM] Move xfrm4_rcv export to its site, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/12] S2io: cosmetic changes, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 5/12] S2io: module loadable parameters, Ravinandan Arakali |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |