netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 4/8] S2io: hardware fixes

To: "'Jeff Garzik'" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 4/8] S2io: hardware fixes
From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:34:31 -0700
Cc: "'Francois Romieu'" <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx>, <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx>, <rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <41672C96.5050501@pobox.com>
Reply-to: <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff,
Sorry about that. We'll add the signed-off-by line.
We are sending the patches as and when they are completed.
In the next couple of days, the remaining patches should
be done. Do you want us to send them after all are complete
or is it okay to send each patch as and when completed ?

Thanks,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 5:11 PM
To: ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Francois Romieu'; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx; leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx;
raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx; rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 4/8] S2io: hardware fixes


48 hours passed between patch #3 and patch #4.  Is there a problem with 
your email system?

Also, your patches do not include the "signed-off-by" line described in 
the two documents I referenced.  The "signed-off-by" line makes the 
lawyers happy.

Since you missed that major legal item, please _read_ the following 
documents:

http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html (see #5, "Sign your work")
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt

        Jeff




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>