lockmeter
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LM for ia64/2.5.x?

from [Jes Sorensen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "John Hawkes" <hawkes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LM for ia64/2.5.x?
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:48:41 -0400
Cc: <lockmeter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <04d601c1e594$e709bc60$6601a8c0@attbi.com>
References: <15548.26206.508431.636@trained-monkey.org> <04d601c1e594$e709bc60$6601a8c0@attbi.com>
Sender: owner-lockmeter@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>>> "John" == John Hawkes <hawkes@xxxxxxx> writes:

John> From: "Jes Sorensen" <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Anyone started playing with porting lockmeter to a recent ia64
>> kernel?  I get missing symbols for _raw_read_trylock and
>> _raw_write_trylock
John> when
>> linking.

John> The basic spinlock declarations changed.  Which kernel version are
John> you interested in?

I am using 2.5.7pre1, but I can upgrade to 2.5.8 as well easily. Which
is the latest kernel you know which works on the ia64? I can probably
up/down-grade if needs be.

Thanks,
Jes
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LM for ia64/2.5.x?, Jes Sorensen
    • Message not available
      • Re: LM for ia64/2.5.x?, Jes Sorensen <=
Previous by Date:  LM for ia64/2.5.x?, Jes Sorensen
Previous by Thread:  LM for ia64/2.5.x?, Jes Sorensen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]