lkcd
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Module support

To: Hiro Sugawara <hsugawar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Module support
From: Tachino Nobuhiro <tachino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:19:11 +0900
Cc: "'Matt D. Robinson'" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <F13508319A1CD41187DE00508BACED6A020673B6@cs2ex.brocade.com>
References: <F13508319A1CD41187DE00508BACED6A020673B6@cs2ex.brocade.com>
Sender: owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) SLIM/1.14.7 () APEL/10.3 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i586-kondara-linux)
At Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:49:23 -0700,
Hiro Sugawara wrote:
> 
> What about my original question about the necessity of System.map?
> I found the kernel Makefile actually uses nm to create it. So, as
> long as the kernel image is available, it doesn't seem necessary.
> 

If you use lcrash with a live system, vmlinux is okay. But
if you examine a saved crash dump, you need the System.map of the kernel
which is running when panic occurred. You can retrieve symbol
information from vmlinux, but current vmdump command saves only System.map.

Am I missing something too :-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>