lkcd
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: lcrash with kdb

To: lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: lcrash with kdb
From: thomas graichen <list-linux.sgi.lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:44:41 +0200
Distribution: local
Organization: spoiled dot org
References: <3ADD5754.87D47267@wipro.com>
Reply-to: thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3-XFS (i586))
Vivek Agarwal <agarwal.vivek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------94954E65DCD7152C87439C15
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Hi !

> Is it possible to have a kernel with both "kdb" and "lcrash".

> I have Linux 2.4.0 installed on my system with "kdb". But when I try to
> patch
> the existing kernel (having kdb) with the "lcrash" patch, If fails at
> some places.
> Please guide if this is possible or not.

i run a kernel with both of them in (to be correct it's the SGI XFS
tree plus lkcd patched in) and it seems to work so far (but i never
had the chance to see it on a real crash) - the conflicts are pretty
easy to resolv manually (mail me if you have problems) ... the im-
portant thing is - you should always only have one of the two enabled
which will act in case of a panic (i usually have kdb off by default
and crash dumps on ... and they worked)

hope that helps

t

-- 
thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> ... perfection is reached, not
when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no
longer anything to take away. --- antoine de saint-exupery

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>