lkcd
[Top] [All Lists]

status (was Re: 2.3 problems)

To: "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: status (was Re: 2.3 problems)
From: Brian Hall <brianwhall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:30:13 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006191530050.9293-100000@mail.turbolinux.com>
Organization: Compaq
Reply-to: Brian Hall <brianwhall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
To try to make some progress, I switched back to my 2.2 tree, and copied over
the arch-independent stuff from lkcd-2.3 CVS to pick up most of the 64-bit
cleanliness. After some minor adjustments and commenting out some things
temporarily, I got lcrash to compile again. Didn't help my problems, though,
lcrash still dies on startup on cmd #3 (as before). I must be missing something
obvious.

I haven't yet fixed the disassembly routines for Alpha yet, I'm still using the
ones for i386. This will have to be fixed eventually, but could that be causing
my problems at this point? My thought was that I'm not getting that far, so the
problem must be elsewhere. My expectation (if lcrash would come up) is that I
could issue some simple commands, show registers, etc. but I would run into
trouble when I tried to print stack traces and so forth.

BTW, let me know if you need some help getting that DS10 to run Linux.

On 20-Jun-2000 Matt D. Robinson wrote:
> I'm trying to get my own personal DS10 booting TL 6.0 right now.
> As soon as that's running, I'll have my own system to use to play
> around with.  I just got the system this afternoon, and I'm doing
> what I can in the meantime to get it running.
> 
> --Matt
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Brian Hall wrote:
>|>Have you had a chance to take a look at this?

-- 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>