I'm not aware of any dependencies in lcrash itself on the configuration
parameters set by "/sbin/lkcd config". However, doesn't "/sbin/lkcd
save" rely on some values set by the config step? Perhaps I missed
something in the /sbin/lkcd script processing.
Tony
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Washer [mailto:washer@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:26 PM
> To: Tony Dziedzic
> Cc: lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Which first? config or save
>
>
>
> Tony,
>
> Are you sure that "Save relies on configuration parameters
> set by config"??
>
> I've looked ( briefly ) at the dump save (lcrash) and don't
> see that it
> requires
> anything from the config step.
>
>
> What did I miss?
>
> - jim
>
>
>
> "Tony Dziedzic" <Tony.Dziedzic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>@oss.sgi.com on 10/23/2001
> 11:11:51 AM
>
> Sent by: owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> To: James Washer/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS, <lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: Which first? config or save
>
>
>
> Correct order is in the sysinit patch: config first, then save. (Save
> relies on configuration parameters set by config.)
>
> Tony Dziedzic
> Storigen Systems, Inc.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Washer [mailto:washer@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:15 PM
> > To: lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Which first? config or save
> >
> >
> > The patch files for sysinit place '/sbin/lkcd config' before
> > '/sbin/lkcd
> > save',
> > however README.lkcd implies the opposite order.
> >
> > Which is correct?
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|