4.1 (or 4.0.1) is fine -- I don't suspect it'll be that long between
releases, as there's a number of people working on LKCD right now,
and everyone wants to get their stuff rolled in and turned over more
quickly (which I agree with).
--Matt
naomi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi, Matt-san.
>
> Since I have not finished testing this yet, I think that it is difficult
> to roll it into 4.0.
> I'd appreciate it if you would roll it into the next release (4.1 or more?).
>
> Naomi.Haseo
>
> From: "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: lcrash sub-commands line completion
> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 01:14:07 -0700
>
> > This sounds like a great thing to add. I have no problems with it.
> > Note that we used to have a readline capability, but we removed it
> > due to some of the GPL/LGPL licensing conflicts.
> >
> > Please let me know if you complete this in the future. I'm still
> > planning to roll a 4.0 release as soon as I talk to the IBM folks
> > about the last code drop I gave them.
> >
> > For those who are working directly in the tree, you'll note we're
> > now moving from 'vmdump' to 'dump' conventions, and hopefully all
> > the future scripts will use this as well.
> >
> > Also, I spoke to someone at MCL, and we'll see how we can roll in
> > mcore into the LKCD project in some capacity.
> >
> > Have at it, Naomi-san. :)
> >
> > --Matt
|