| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: how to make kernel do system dump ? |
| From: | "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 06 Nov 2000 05:23:47 -0800 |
| Cc: | Hari Kannan <hkannan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Morano <tjm@xxxxxxx>, hiren_mehta@xxxxxxxxxxx, lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Alacritech, Inc. |
| References: | <200011032303.PAA07244@tomb.fsc-usa.com> <3A02F7E4.5BEF806D@alacritech.com> <20001104094622.A10698@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <3A06A5D2.D08F2597@alacritech.com> <20001106204537.A26147@gruyere.muc.suse.de> |
| Sender: | owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 04:36:34AM -0800, Matt D. Robinson wrote: > > > > Cool. We figured it was broken behavior -- we'd get messed up stack > > pages for some dumps where scheduling took place. It was my > > original understanding that this wouldn't happen, but then, 2.2 has > > a number of broken issues. > > You should probably only call the kernel dumper after the stop IPI sending > has finished, otherwise the other CPUs may still schedule in 2.4 > > -Andi Calling smp_send_stop() isn't sufficient? I thought that did a disable_local_APIC() for each CPU (except the one we're running on), then executes the hlt instruction for each of those CPUs. There doesn't seem to be a routine to verify the apic_write_around() call has completed or not -- are you referring to something else? Just looking for clarity. --Matt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: how to make kernel do system dump ?, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: how to make kernel do system dump ?, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: how to make kernel do system dump ?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: how to make kernel do system dump ?, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |