lkcd
[Top] [All Lists]

lcrash3.0 vs. crash2.5 ?

To: lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: lcrash3.0 vs. crash2.5 ?
From: Moo Kim <Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:18:39 -0800
Sender: owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
 Hi,

 I recently joined the lkcd mailing and I have a newbie 
 question.   I am fairly new to Linux.

 I see there are two version of SVR4 UNIX crash-like 
 utilities for Linux: 

  1. crash2.5   : http://www.missioncriticallinux.com/technology/crash/
  2. lcrash 3.0 : http://oss.sgi.com/projects/lkcd/
 
 Is there any documentation/FAQ available that describes the
 difference between two, pros/cons, etc ?   I tried to look 
 thru the online documentation on each site and deja news, 
 but could not find any relavent info.   If someone had 
 hands-on experience with both utilities, could you please 
 share ?
 
 We (in NCR Corp) is looking into porting one of the existing
 software product (Teradata RDBMS) on Linux and this product
 has the kernel device driver which will be implemented as 
 loadable module.   I would be interested in knowing whether 
 lcrash3.0 currently provide the following capability:

  README file in crash2.5 stated as one needs to recompile
  the kernel with -g option (to get debug symbol info).

  Does lcrash3.0 require for kernel to compie with -g option 
  as well ?   Because -g option for kernel build may not be 
  desireable for the kernel running on a production box.  
  It would be nice to be able to use lcrash for analyzing Linux 
  panic dumps (as well as live system) that have kernel compiled 
  with/without -g option.   This same question also goes to 
  kernel module as well.  I see lcrash3.0 provides the 
  'Kerntypes' target and perhaps this is the way to load the 
  kernel symbol information for non-debug kernel (?).    
  
 Thanks in advance,

 Moo Kim    Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx
 NCR Corporation
 ph: 858-485-2233 fax: 858-485-2032

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>