linux-scalability
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Adding the notion of System vs. Application processors

To: clemej@xxxxxxxxxxxx (PianoMan)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding the notion of System vs. Application processors
From: Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 15:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dimitris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dimitris Michailidis), linux-scalability@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0008081604530.15916-100000@pianoman.cluster.toy> from "PianoMan" at Aug 08, 2000 04:37:49 PM
Sender: owner-LinuxScalability@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> except, like you said, you need the system call .... Also, I have already

As I noted to you in my first response to you, I did everything I could
to get a system call to do pinning. It is not that hard to do, and I 
have created primitive patches towards this in the past, except that it
will not go into 2.4. No SGI scret there ...

> > Don't turn off the timer interrupt.  It would mess up time accounting.  We
> > also need it for slab cache management.  IPIs must also be left on.

FWIW, on IRIX, you _can_ turn off the timer interrupt on specific cpus,
as well as IPIs, but these were a headache to get right ... probably 
worth it, just to be able to claim realtime latencies ....

> mechanism's we need to do the rest in user space.  Please realize that I
> do not work for SGI, I don't know what you've got up your sleeves... I did
> not know you were getting ready to add a syscall to do the processor
> pinning....

See above ...

Kanoj

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>