| To: | Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel compile time |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Jun 2000 21:27:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | John Hawkes <hawkes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx>, linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx, skunx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200006011842.LAA84787@google.engr.sgi.com>; from kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com on Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 11:42:32AM -0700 |
| References: | <021301bfcbf5$b3ac41e0$ce059aa3@engr.sgi.com> <200006011842.LAA84787@google.engr.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 11:42:32AM -0700, Kanoj Sarcar wrote: > True. And the other culprit is probably all the locore code (like > fast tlb handlers, inital syscall/intr/pagefault code) that executes > before the timers are switched from user to kernel/system. Ulf's lmbench results for a UP Origin kernel are significantly below what I achieve on my R5000 Indy. That's suspicious. I don't think all of the difference can be explained by 32-bit vs. 64-bit code. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: more peeks at performance, John Hawkes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | cpu enabling, Kanoj Sarcar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel compile time, Kanoj Sarcar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kernel compile time, Leo Dagum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |