Re: broken compiler?

[Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:41:57PM -0800, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:

> I am going nuts. The above should read:
> 
> volatile unsigned int test_lock2 = 0x123;
> volatile unsigned int test_lock = 0xabc;
> volatile unsigned int test_lock3 = 0x789;
> 
> If I load the dword at address &test_lock (which is a dword aligned addr),
> I get 0xabc00000789. I was expecting 0x78900000abc.

Ok, but that's exactly what is expected to happen?!?

  Ralf