kgdb
[Top] [All Lists]

(Fwd) Re: kgdb for 2.2.18

To: kgdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (Fwd) Re: kgdb for 2.2.18
From: sfoehner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Scott Foehner)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Sender: owner-kgdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
I accidentally replied directly to Manoj instead of the mailing list yesteday.
 There is some useful information here regarding kgdb on the SGI web site, and
what is on kgdb.sourceforge.net.

Scott

--- Forwarded mail from Manoj Ekbote <manoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:39:08 -0500
From: Manoj Ekbote <manoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Scott Foehner <sfoehner>
Subject: Re: kgdb for 2.2.18

Thanks for the info.I was pretty much confused by your previous mail.

Manoj

Scott Foehner wrote:

> On Feb 26,  5:09pm, Manoj Ekbote wrote:
> > Subject: Re: kgdb for 2.2.18
> > I got it from http://www.kgdb.sourceforge.net.
>
> Well, that patch is significantly different, so I can't speak for the
problems
> you are having with it.  That patch is basically a back-port of the 2.4
series
> patch.  Note that it requires that you have SMP turned on.
>
> The 2.2 series patches on the SGI patches are not a back-port of the 2.4
> patches.  They are simply kgdb as it stood on 2.2, plus the early-connect
code
> with was accepted by David Grothe into the 2.3 and later versions of kgdb.
>
> You can contact Amit Kale, who maintains the above web page about problems
with
> the patches on sourceforge.
>
> Also, I will hopefully have a 2.2.18 version of the SGI patch out soon, which
> will work fine on kernels compiled UP.
>
> Scott
>
> --
> Scott Foehner  SGI  Linux Scalability  sfoehner@xxxxxxx  650.933.3473

---End of forwarded mail from Manoj Ekbote <manoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • (Fwd) Re: kgdb for 2.2.18, Scott Foehner <=