kdb
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] kdb working, but kgdb not? 2.6.35-rc3

from [caz yokoyama] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] kdb working, but kgdb not? 2.6.35-rc3
From: caz yokoyama <cazyokoyama@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:01:36 +0200
Cc: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, KGDB Mailing List <kgdb-bugreport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4qz/Ym5zF5E+Ebu47L1w8AlK6AYolretuYWMmrwg2bU=; b=tCeGVnCkvIMJv41fE9YM1IjX5Pt+hsjEOdISnn/AIEwQMq8O+7Ds7uLuhkGTgv8tJl SYNOGTiQyrAb5yOFc+REWxquggBGd4pVCEL/yuMBYiwCkSI3SecfVD7C67Xn1HgQFXa7 xfGnuWL2K4VhBS4xvl9jwytUqrLqMa59WUALs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=lsFjnlFCv0bebhKfvCzK9GXpHgaOp42V+XHewLjDuo9iagQA/nPjXJF5K+ov5ES2J0 SZ/IJAyUbEOhgXAIgFUG19+f/zozu9L8GGkRmcvEpM88YdKwNngUPFuF/luf7DIAX2Si qZq2vhKGqxjCyCM1c+yAav2jbZUj7cOih/njw=
In-reply-to: <4C28C197.6000609@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1324243261.5330.1277735064489.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1315301307.5332.1277735201736.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinhGY1u7zWBLmpFBK74qUSliWbBrrtEsjn_pgxS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C28C197.6000609@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yes. As you find in the patch, there are 2 commands are required to support. I don't know if they can be implemented on kgdb. I need investigation. I'll let you know when I find.
-caz
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/28/2010 10:33 AM, caz yokoyama wrote:
> I recognized this problem and have a patch. It was caused by introduction of
> new commands between gdb and gdbserver which Linux kernel does not support.
> Here is the patch.
>
>

Hi Caz,

Is it the case that the kgdb stub should be responding with some sort of
message?

Certainly we are always open to improving the kgdb side too.

Cheers,
Jason.



--
-caz, yokoyama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, caz@xxxxxxxxxxx, 503-804-1028(m)

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] kdb working, but kgdb not? 2.6.35-rc3, Jason Wessel
Next by Date:  AIT - Professional People Locator Database Access, N. Gopal
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] kdb working, but kgdb not? 2.6.35-rc3, Jason Wessel
Next by Thread:  Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] kdb working, but kgdb not? 2.6.35-rc3, caz yokoyama
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]