| To: | Will Schmidt <willschm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kdb ps patch |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jul 2003 02:03:12 +1000 |
| Cc: | kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx, linas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:45:18 EST." <OFA5785D39.9E649B65-ON86256D67.0055F0E8-86256D67.00568BC4@us.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:45:18 -0500, Will Schmidt <willschm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Yes, the ppc64 tree (that this problem came from) is backlevel; still >running with the kdb-common v2.1/v2.3 code. Why have the ppc64 people never submitted patches to the kdb list? Other architectures submit patches which makes it possible for me to update them as the common code changes, but not ppc64. The other architectures appear on oss.sgi.com, but kdb for ppc64 is a dark, deep secret. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kdb ps patch, Will Schmidt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kdb ps patch, Will Schmidt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kdb ps patch, Will Schmidt |
| Next by Thread: | KDB enhancements, linas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |