kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: Trouble with i386 KDB current and 2.6.7

To: kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx, kmannth@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fw: Trouble with i386 KDB current and 2.6.7
From: Kevin Stansell <stanselk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:47:07 -0400
In-reply-to: <OF826468A0.EA4881CD-ON85256EBC.0045CC35-85256EBC.0045F406@us.ibm.com>
References: <OF826468A0.EA4881CD-ON85256EBC.0045CC35-85256EBC.0045F406@us.ibm.com>
Sender: kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 15:39, Keith Owens wrote:
>  > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:54:43 -0700,
>  > keith <kmannth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > >linux 2.6.7-bk4
>  > >kdb-v4.4-2.6.7-common-1
>  > >kdb-v4.4-2.6.7-i386-1
>  > >
>  > >My issue is as follows...
>  > >  If I don't enable kdb everything works fine.  When I enable and boot
>  > >with KDB I fall into kdb when I bring the secondary cpus online.  KDB
>  > >claims it was entered via an NMI.  Without kdb there are no nmis being
>  > >registered by the system.  
>  >
>  > This debug patch should get you up and running, and tell you where the
>  > nmi is coming from.  Untested.
> 
> Ok booted without kdb and I did not see that zone alignment error.  Has
> kdb ran on a numa i386 system before?  It looks to be tinkering with the
> VM somehow. Tomorrow I'll try disabling numa and seeing if things work.

As a datapoint: I have ran KDB (with the 2.4 kernel) on a summit box in 
the past with no problems.
---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>