kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kdb wishlist

To: slurn@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: kdb wishlist
From: LA Walsh <law@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 12:38:43 -0700
Cc: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200105081657.JAA05739@slurndal-lnx.verisign.com>
Sender: owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
slurn@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> How about using the break condition instead.  This is only for the
> serial port, and most terminal emulators (e.g. kermit, minicom) provide
> a means to generate a break condition on the serial port.

---
    As much as I like that idea, I wondering -- if I am "telnet'ed" into
a serial multiplexor or even a linux box, will breaking into telnet
command mode and sending a 'telnet brk' get transmitted through the
current apps/hardware and be translated to a serial-break on the serial
line.  That requires a leap of faith I wouldn't be be comfortable
making or is usage over telnet-serial "routing hardware" (i.e. Annex boxes),
"telnet'ing", "rsh'ed", "ssh'ed" to a system and "cu"ing to a serial port not
considered important?

-linda

(p.s. linux kernel removed from CC list as this is more of a kdb issue than
a kernel issue)

--
The above thoughts and           | They may have nothing to do with
writings are my own.             | the opinions of my employer. :-)
L A Walsh                        | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI
law@xxxxxxx                      | Voice: (650) 933-5338




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>