On Fri, 17 May 2002 15:01:07 -0700,
Matthew Dobson <colpatch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Keith Owens wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 15 May 2002 18:03:29 -0700,
>> Patricia Gaughen <gone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >2.5.9 on an 8 proc numaq box. I saw the recent patch from Ethan Solomita
>> >and
>> >I'll give it a try tonight or tomorrow. But we've ran into a couple of
>> >issues:
>> >
>> > - when the system hangs we enter kdb but using bt, bta and btp do
>> > not produce
>> >stacks for any of the processes. We're able to get the stacks manually, but
>> >this is not much fun :-)
>>
>> Which version of gcc? Newer versions of gcc produce stack frame code
>> that kdb cannot backtrace without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y.
>I'm currently using gcc version 3.0.2. And I definitely do have
>CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER turned on.
Any error messages? I am guessing that it says "Stack is not in
task_struct, backtrace not available". task_struct data has been moved
around in recent 2.5 kernels and kdb has not been changed to validate
the new layout yet.
|