kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [kdb] new kdb over kgdb

To: Joe Korty <joe.korty@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [kdb] new kdb over kgdb
From: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:32:19 -0500
Cc: kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091026150500.GA22755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20091026150500.GA22755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> I've been playing a little with the new kdb-over-kgdb.
> In some ways it is better than the old kdb.  Unlike the
> old kdb, I see no misbehavior on my x86_64 box using the
> new.
> 
> Why not make an official release, as kdb-5.0, of what is
> there today?  Or perhaps, checkpatch it first and feed
> back in a few of the more important commands such as the
> disassembler.

I'm inclined to wait until the core gets accepted upstream.  If that
doesn't happen for 2.6.33, then I might start a separate kdb-5 tree that
is the kdb/kgdb merge.

mh

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>