| To: | kapish@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kdb prompt?? |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 May 2001 07:23:10 +1000 |
| Cc: | kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Thu, 24 May 2001 09:00:02 -0400." <200105241300.JAA06476@www20.ureach.com> |
| Sender: | owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 24 May 2001 09:00:02 -0400, Kapish K <kapish@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >another query... how does the frame pointer support help in >obtaining better debug information? In theory they help to work out where the stack frames are for the back trace command, the early versions of kdb required frame pointers to do backtrace. But see the comments at the start of kdb_get_next_ar() in kdb/kdbsupport.c and kdba_prologue() in arch/i386/kdb/kdbasupport.c. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: kdb prompt??, Marc Esipovich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | subscriber test, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: kdb prompt??, Marc Esipovich |
| Next by Thread: | KDB: How Can you "C"???, Nitin Dhingra |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |