| To: | "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: new patch for KDB command "kill" |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Apr 2003 15:37:11 +1000 |
| Cc: | "KDB (E-mail)" <kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Fri, 04 Apr 2003 12:34:05 +0800." <37FBBA5F3A361C41AB7CE44558C3448E488F3D@pdsmsx403.ccr.corp.intel.com> |
| Sender: | kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:34:05 +0800, "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > OK, I fixed the first 2 problems you mentioned. > In order to skip these unnecessary lock code, I write the signal >handling code myself. I attached 2 patches, one uses send_sig_info(), >the other keeps my own handling. Applying the send_sig_info() version, with some cleanup. Thanks. kdb v4.1 will be out later today including the kill command. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: new patch for KDB command "kill", Zhang, Sonic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] kdb on SMP (breakpoint hits multiple cpus simultaneously), Vamsi Krishna S . |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: new patch for KDB command "kill", Zhang, Sonic |
| Next by Thread: | XScale patch for KDB4.0 is ready now., edie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |