kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kdb for kernel 2.6

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kdb for kernel 2.6
From: Sachin Kulkarni <write2sck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:33:40 -0400
Cc: kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cnK2SGZGV1AmhlQmE+Gaqmm7xa+v+sg/eB0akdZcL3UAMEwevVZw6MAumkC2frPA8qx9uECAMiKwOHn0w7zPS748IJLDG/tsaXBdKRsvrXtu9enXywTxMteHooEAGTs/ieKVSfD+BTkE6iowBgW8sAk+dz2phgUTZv/2aAlSTFo=
In-reply-to: <1438.1129857201@ocs3.ocs.com.au>
References: <132d4af90510201117l4cec0e0dsc4a8ea44d7a4993a@mail.gmail.com> <1438.1129857201@ocs3.ocs.com.au>
Sender: kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Maybe I will switch to kernel 2.4 then.
Thanks a lot.

-Sachin

On 10/20/05, Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:17:46 -0400,
> Sachin Kulkarni <write2sck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I want to remotely debug the arm linux kernel on a Intel XScale board.
> >I am currently using kernel 2.6. Which version/patch of kdb should I
> >use for the same? I have read the FAQ which says that kdb works till
> >v2.4, but just in case if anybody has tried this before, it would be
> >really helpful for me to get started.
>
> The xscale specific patches were supplied by Intel.  But they have not
> sent any patches since 2.4.20.  I do not know if Intel are still
> interested in supporting kdb on xscale.
>
>

---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>