| To: | jfv@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Announce: kdb v4.4 for x86-64 architecture |
| From: | Jim Houston <jim.houston@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 04 Aug 2004 17:23:27 -0400 |
| Cc: | kaos@xxxxxxx, kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200406071851.22461.jfv@bluesong.net> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <200406071851.22461.jfv@bluesong.net> |
| Reply-to: | jim.houston@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Jack, I was very pleased to see your announcement of kdb for x86-64. I found a bug in the debug trap handling used for single step. In particular, in do_debug() when kdb has handled the single step, it needs a "return regs;" rather than "return 0;". The debug entry in entry.S sets %rsp to this returned value and uses it to restore the registers. Since %rsp is zero, you get a double fault. Jim Houston - Concurrent Computer Corp. --------------------------- Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add support to display memory given the physical address, Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | question about setting breakpoint on functions, Randolph Chung |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Add support to display memory given the physical address, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli |
| Next by Thread: | question about setting breakpoint on functions, Randolph Chung |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |