kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Backtraces with interrupts or signals seem unreliable, anyone else s

To: kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Backtraces with interrupts or signals seem unreliable, anyone else seen this?
From: Thomas Duffy <Thomas.Duffy.99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:45:40 -0700
In-reply-to: <7714.1055363806@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
References: <7714.1055363806@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Sender: kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 13:36, Keith Owens wrote:
> Uggh, I hate top quoting on mailing lists.

Of course, top quoting is what you like, top *posting* is what you hate
:-)

BTW, I agree with you Keith..in the immortal words of Nick Moffitt:

 
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

This is, unfortunately, a crusade we will never win.  LookOut forces
this bad behavior.

-tduffy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>