On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 jlim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed Sep 27 20:59:17 2000, tamstorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > A couple of questions : First, would it be possible to put an rpm with the
> > Inventor debug libraries on the ftp server ?
>
> Look for sgi-OpenInventor-devel-2.1.5-6.i386.rpm in
>
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/inventor/download/
>
> Debug libraries are installed in /usr/lib/InventorDebug.
Yep, I found that right after sending my mail. Sorry for the noise, but
thanks for the reply.
> > Second question, since I'm having problems building the code from scratch
> > (inventor-2.1.5-6) I'm wondering if some of it has to do with my compiler
> > version. What's the tried-and-tested version of g++ for building inventor
> > ? (I'm using 2.95.2)
>
> On my PC:
>
> % g++ --version
> egcs-2.91.66
>
> Looks like your compiler is complaining about the lack of a (default) int
> return type. The compiler I'm using is silent about it.
Yes, gcc 2.95.2 is much more standard C++ compliant, which means more
features but also being more picky :-/ Are there any efforts to make the
inventor code "standard C++" compliant ? Would a set of patches to make it
compliant be accepted or are there compelling reasons not to move forward ?
On a related note, I believe that the problem I'm having with my
application might be because I'm using a newer version of libstdc++. Could
you add the "correct" version of libstdc++ to the list of dependencies in
FAQ.misc ?
Rasmus
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rasmus.Tamstorf@xxxxxxxxxx "A problem worthy of attack,
Walt Disney Feature Animation proves its worth by hitting back" Kumbel
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|