| To: | Alex Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10 |
| From: | Atif <aghaffar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Oct 2001 02:42:28 +0200 |
| Cc: | Nathan Thompson-Amato <nathan.thompson-amato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, fam@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110101741180.776-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aghaffar@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-fam@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913 |
Alex Larsson wrote: Do people routinely monitor files in over 8192 directories? If so, they can up the max, without even recompiling the kernel. Perhaps not routinely, not when FAM is used in GUI apps, but in one usage (REPLICATION) it can be useful. An example scenario: http://www.linuxfocus.org/English/March2001/article199.shtml best regards. -- Atif Ghaffar ---------------------------. http://www.atifghaffar.com ¦ homepage -- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe fam | mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10, Alex Larsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [fam] libfam 2.6.4, Garfycx |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10, Alex Larsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10, Jerome De Greef |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |