There isn't a separate list, he's just sent me a few patches privately.
As I've mentioned to a few people, I'm currently on military leave and so
can't devote any real time to the project. My desire is that FAM "work" on
IRIX. Past that I'm just here to facilitate the project. Personally I
think it'd be easier to go back to 2.6.10 for a fresh start, but you guys
will drive everything.
Michael
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:26:16AM -0800, Viner, David wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> I didn't realize work was happening on the 2.7 branch. Have you sent
> messages to this list regarding your patches? Is there another FAM
> development list?
>
> dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Wendland [mailto:joergland@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:14 AM
> To: Viner, David
> Cc: 'fam@xxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Re: sourceforge and 2.6.10
>
>
> David,
>
> Viner, David, on 2004-03-10, 08:47, you wrote:
> > It seems like no development is happening against the 2.7.0 codebase
> that's
> > currently in sourceforge. However, I think we've seen two or three patches
> > to 2.6.10. I think we should remove the code in sourceforge now, commit
> the
> > 2.6.10 codebase, apply the patches (e.g., dnotify), and publish a 2.6.11.
>
>
> That's not true. Since I am the maintainer of fam Debian packages I
> have some patches against 2.7 in use that were ported from 2.6.10,
> including the DNotify patch. I am currently working with the upstream
> maintainer to integrate these patches. Please stay tuned...
>
> Joerg
>
> --
> Joerg "joergland" Wendland
> GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417
--
Michael A. Raymond Office: (651) 683-3434
Core OS Scheduling Group Real-Time Lead
|