Re: fam and logging

[Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>]

    Sounds good to me.  Show me a diff and I'll let you check it in.
Tomorrow I'll be checking in a few small changes that people have sent me.
                                                 Michael

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:50:10PM -0800, Viner, David wrote:
> hi,
> 
> FAM currently has its own logging facility.  what do you think of replacing
> that with log4cpp? http://log4cpp.sourceforge.net/ ?
> 
> replacing the existing implementation of logging would do a couple of
> things.  First, we could use a logging facility that others (read potential
> users) are familiar with.  Second, it would be one less completely static
> class in the fam source code.  Third, the logging of log4cpp (must like the
> other log4j implementations) is highly configurable.  
> 
> thoughts ?
> 
> dave

-- 
Michael A. Raymond              Office: (651) 683-3434
Core OS Scheduling Group        Real-Time Lead