| To: | Erez Zadok <ezk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [fam] Re: [prepatch] Directory Notification |
| From: | willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 21 May 2000 16:07:51 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fam@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000521121830.X28590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, May 21, 2000 at 12:18:30PM -0400 |
| References: | <20000519225041.P28590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200005201931.PAA07400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000521121830.X28590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-fam@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 12:18:30PM -0400, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > There are really 4 conflated patches here: > > * A rewrite of the fs/locks.c code. > * Making kill_fasync() SMP-safe. > * Directory notification. > * Addition of file leases. > > I should split them up. ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/people/willy/2.3.99pre8/ dirnot.diff requires killfasync.diff to be applied first, but it's not relevant to understanding the patches. I just split the patches up by hand, there may well be duplicated pieces or poor line numbering. As I suspect the lock-rewrite patch is by far the biggest chunk; it includes the leases. Trond, I haven't fixed any of the problems you noticed yet, you needn't bother looking. -- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe fam | mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [fam] Re: [prepatch] Directory Notification, willy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [fam] bug in fam/imon?, raster |
| Previous by Thread: | [fam] Re: [prepatch] Directory Notification, willy |
| Next by Thread: | [fam] Re: [prepatch] Directory Notification, Rusty Ballinger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |