fam
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: fam using lots of CPU

from [Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fam using lots of CPU
From: "Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)" <amadorm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 12:40:55 -0500
Cc: nf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fam@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nautilus mailing <nautilus-list@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1085684740.3286.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1085644229.3221.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1085683907.3438.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1085684740.3286.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: fam-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
El jue, 27-05-2004 a las 14:05, Jean-Marc Valin escribiÃ:

> 
> Actually, the main thing is that I don't think fam should ever be
> enabled by default on a system. Such unpredictable behaviour is simply
> not acceptable from a daemon.

Or maybe that fam should be enabled if it weren't that braindamaged when
met with dnotify...

> 
>       Jean-Marc
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Marc Valin
> http://www.xiph.org/~jm/
> LABORIUS
> Università de Sherbrooke, QuÃbec, Canada
-- 
        Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
        GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: fam using lots of CPU, Jean-Marc Valin
Next by Date:  [no subject], udelnet
Previous by Thread:  Re: fam using lots of CPU, Jean-Marc Valin
Next by Thread:  [no subject], udelnet
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]