| To: | bench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 |
| From: | Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 24 Nov 2003 09:12:23 +0100 |
| Cc: | Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>, fam@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1069527846.1638.352.camel@purple> |
| References: | <20031121155043.F151992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBE93BD.ACA3CAC6@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200311212033.01253.steleman@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031122122722.A172698@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1069527846.1638.352.camel@purple> |
| Sender: | fam-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 20:04, Ben wrote:
> well, if we're open to suggestions.... :)
>
> The biggest thing that's kept me from using FAM in the past has been the
> way FAM handles moves: it tells you a file was removed and another one
> was created, but not that they are the same file. For keeping tabs on
> where files are in a file system, that makes it pretty hard to do it
> with 100% accuracy.
This isn't the fault of fam really. It depends on what information the
kernel give you about changes.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl@xxxxxxxxxx alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
He's a jaded Catholic romance novelist trapped in a world he never made. She's
a hard-bitten gypsy barmaid living on borrowed time. They fight crime!
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2, Ben |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: FAM 2.7.0-pre2, Viner, David |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2, Ben |
| Next by Thread: | RE: FAM 2.7.0-pre2, Viner, David |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |