fam
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [fam] fam &imon &linux & KDE :-)

To: raster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [fam] fam &imon &linux & KDE :-)
From: "Rusty Ballinger" <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 17:13:25 -0700
Cc: fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: raster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx "Re: [fam] fam &imon &linux & KDE :-)" (Apr 3, 5:51pm)
References: <200004040051.RAA19250@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: rusty@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ->  I still haven't posted a request for comments etc. on linux-kernel yet;
> ->  I was hoping to have a working 2.3.99-preX version first, but my first
> ->  quick attempt was broken.
>
> actually a question.. is imon at all destined to become part of the
> base kernel sometime (maybe 2.5 devel series) ? i got this question
> from E users after i nicely informed them they'll need fam from now on..
> :)

I hope so.  And I think it will, eventually, but if it were my kernel I'd
feel a lot better about imon if I didn't have to see a bunch of IMON_EVENT
calls in my fs code.  (And even if imon never gets in--if everyone hates the
implementation or something--the idea of kernel notification of file
operations is useful enough that something *just like* imon would go in, and
then fam could just use that.)

--Rusty

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe fam | mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>