fam
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [fam] RE; installation help

To: "Michael Wardle" <michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [fam] RE; installation help
From: "Rob Zietlow" <zietlow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:57:14 -0600
Cc: <fam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <004301c1c9f6$fc1fba00$1201a8c0@bart> <3C8EF0A2.8050805@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Wardle" <michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Rob Zietlow" <zietlow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <fam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [fam] RE; installation help

> As you can see, the problem is FAM is looking for a mntent, but it
> doesn't have one.  This is a known problem
> (see http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122), however I thought
> that was fixed by the patches in FreeBSD ports.  Do the patches appear
> to be there?

Yes the patches are in the /usr/ports/devel/fam/files/ dir.  It contains
fam.sh.sample, patch-Makefile.am and patch-freebsd.   The patch-freebsd
issue has numerous references to MNTTYPE_NFS.  I am looking through it, but
my programming foo is well nill, so it only makes a little sense to me.

> Did you just do a cvsup then a make install, or did you do something
> else?

This is a fresh install, then cvsup w/ the new make world.  Which is my
normal practice...CD install, cvsup, make/install world  install additional
packages.

> What version was it trying to build?  I think FreeBSD ports is still
> using FAM 2.6.4.  Is this the version of the source that you downloaded?
> I haven't tested whether the patches written for 2.6.4 will work with
> 2.6.7.

fam 2.6.4

> It shouldn't be a problem with FAM, because the 2.6.4 tarball won't
> have changed, and that's the one that cvsup should be getting.

right which is what I gathered from freshports.org and from the last email
to the list  that I was quoting that happened right around the last time I
built up a box.

> I'm happy to get this fixed in the standard FAM distribution, but
> I don't know that I can take the patch from ports as is, at least
> partially because it's under the BSD license.  (Personally, I can't
> see any possible problem with the license, but I'm not a lawyer.)
>
> Let me know if you require further assistance.

Thank you for the response, I'll also be shooting out an email to the
fbsd-questions list to see if anyone else has encountered this issue.


> Regards
>
> --
> MICHAEL WARDLE
> SGI Desktop & Admin Team
> Adacel Technologies
>
>
>


--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe fam | mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>