devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH] Graceful failure in devfs_remove() in 2.5.x

To: devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH] Graceful failure in devfs_remove() in 2.5.x
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:29:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: devfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hello!

It's already the second time that I encounter a kernel panic in the same
place.  When devfs_remove() is called on a non-existent file entry, the
kernel panics and I have to reboot the system.

First time it was unregistering of pseudoterminals.  This time it's
ide-floppy module that doesn't register devfs entries if the media is
absent but still tries to unregister them.  The bug in ide-floppy will be
reported separately.

The point of this message is that the failure in devfs_remove() is
possible, especially with rarely used drivers.  Secondly, is not fatal
enough to justify an immediate panic and reboot.  Thirdly, devfs misses a
chance to tell the user what's going wrong.

This patch makes devfs_remove() print an error to the kernel log and
continue.  PRINTK is defined in fs/devfs/base.c to report errors in the
cases like this one:

#define PRINTK(format, args...) \
   {printk (KERN_ERR "%s" format, __FUNCTION__ , ## args);}

The patch:

==============================================
--- linux.orig/fs/devfs/base.c
+++ linux/fs/devfs/base.c
@@ -1710,6 +1710,11 @@ void devfs_remove(const char *fmt, ...)
        if (n < 64 && buf[0]) {
                devfs_handle_t de = _devfs_find_entry(NULL, buf, 0);

+               if (!de) {
+                       PRINTK ("(%s): not found, cannot remove\n", buf);
+                       return;
+               }
+
                write_lock(&de->parent->u.dir.lock);
                _devfs_unregister(de->parent, de);
                devfs_put(de);
==============================================

The patch is against Linux 2.5.70.

Linux 2.4.21-rc4 already has protection against panic although it doesn't
print the error message - see devfs_unlink() in fs/devfs/base.c

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>