reg@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Let me respond to my own question here.
> DEVFSD seems to compile fine in a RH6.2 based system with 2.4.0-test11, but
> has
> the problems I mentioned in an earlier note in a RH7.0 sytem with the same
> 2.4.0-test11.
>
> I guess Ill write this off as just one more problem with RH7.0 and stop
> waisting my
> time with it. This is not the FIRST problem Ive had with RH7.0 (sigh).
>
> --
> Reg.Clemens
> reg@xxxxxxx
Reg,
I'm brand new to the list.
Subscribed because devfs failed to compile for me as well.
I'm not using RH stuff...but out of curiosity what versions
of GLIBC are each of the RH6.2 & RH7.0 running. Recently,
I compiled & installed glibc 2.2 and suspect that 2.2 may
have broken devfsd.
Can you get a ". /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux" output
for each system?
Martin
shadow:/mnt/devfsd# . /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux
-- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look
-- unusual then possibly you have very old versions)
Linux shadow 2.4.0-test12 #1 SMP Wed Nov 29 18:54:59 CST 2000 i686 unknown
Kernel modules 2.3.21
Gnu C 2.95.2
Gnu Make 3.79.1
Binutils 2.10.1
Linux C Library 2.2.so*
Dynamic linker ldd (GNU libc) 2.2
Procps 2.0.2
Mount 2.10q
Net-tools 1.57
Kbd 1.00
Sh-utils 2.0
Modules Loaded
|