| To: | "David Gilbert" <ad_gilbert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Newbie question: running devfsd forces implicit mount of /proc? |
| From: | Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Jul 2002 21:09:41 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <F1142A1IkleVNnZYe6C00013c2d@hotmail.com> |
| References: | <F1142A1IkleVNnZYe6C00013c2d@hotmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:38, David Gilbert wrote: > I've just started playing around with devfs and encountered an odd thing > (to me anyway)... > > Once running, I noticed errors from the init scripts about trying to mount > /proc. I've disabled the explict mount of /proc to work around the problem. > But what's going on? It seems that once devfsd is running there is an > implicit mounting of /proc? Is this normal behaviour? You don't mention which distribution you're using, it's probably a distribution issue. My start script for Debian mounts /proc because that's the only way to determine whether it's already running. Why is this a problem? -- I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software. If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the >From field. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Newbie question: running devfsd forces implicit mount of /proc?, David Gilbert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Newbie question: running devfsd forces implicit mount of /proc?, Pavel Roskin |
| Previous by Thread: | Newbie question: running devfsd forces implicit mount of /proc?, David Gilbert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Newbie question: running devfsd forces implicit mount of /proc?, Pavel Roskin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |