devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Distributions for devfs

To: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Distributions for devfs
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:14:20 -0600
Cc: chippo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020421101000.9A496CA5@lyta.coker.com.au>
References: <3CC28C58.9DCA77C3@netactive.co.za> <20020421101000.9A496CA5@lyta.coker.com.au>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Russell Coker writes:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:54, Chris the Elder wrote:
> > I apologise if this has been discussed before; since my devfs
> > installation has been working for years, I haven't concentrated on the
> > mailing list much.
> >
> > Are there any full-ish distributions that come with devfs by default?
> >
> > I found the 'Rock' distribution had devfs by default, but it wasn't full
> > enough for me.  Part of the reason that I get a distribution, is that
> > I'm too lazy (or old) to configure assorted hardware and install
> > software by hand anymore.
> 
> Debian/woody has good devfs support.
> 
> I fix most bugs that are reported against devfsd in <24 hours.  I've
> checked out many other Debian packages and filed bug reports where
> they didn't work well with devfs.
> 
> Richard, has anyone from any other major distribution sent you more
> patches than I did?

I haven't counted. I've gotten a fair number of patches from the
Mandrake people as well.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current:   rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>