| To: | drepper@xxxxxxxxxx (Ulrich Drepper) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x |
| From: | Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:31:45 -0700 |
| Cc: | Pierre Rousselet <pierre.rousselet@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Ford <david@xxxxxxxxx>, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <m3wvbgnnk3.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> |
| References: | <3A7383B2.19DDD006@linux.com> <3A73C1D8.578AEEE@wanadoo.fr> <m3wvbgnnk3.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> |
| Sender: | owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Ulrich Drepper writes:
> Pierre Rousselet <pierre.rousselet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > for me :
> > make CFLAGS='-O2 -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE'
> > compiles without any patch. is it correct ?
>
> Yes. RTLD_NEXT is not in any standard, it's an extension available
> via -D_GNU_SOURCE.
So why do old binaries (compiled with glibc 2.1.3) segfault when they
call dlsym() with RTLD_NEXT? Even newly compiled binaries (with glibc
2.2) still segfault.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] devfs v99.19 available, Richard Gooch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x, Ulrich Drepper |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] devfs v99.19 available, Richard Gooch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x, Ulrich Drepper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |