csa
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Linux Disk Performance/File IO per process

To: List User <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Linux Disk Performance/File IO per process
From: James Sutherland <jas88@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:18:47 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Chris Evans <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony.Young@xxxxxx, slug@xxxxxxxxxxx, csa@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <037d01c08a44$9bb9ace0$160912ac@stcostlnds2zxj>
Sender: owner-csa@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, List User wrote:

> Just wanted to 'chime' in here.  Yes this would be noisy and will have
> an affect on system performance however these statistics are what are
> used in conjunction with several others to size systems as well as to
> plan on growth.  If Linux is to be put into an enterprise environment
> these types of statistics will be needed.
> 
> When you start hooking up 100's of 'physical volumes' (be it real
> disks or raided logical drives) this data helps you pin-point
> problems.  I think the idea of having the ability to turn such
> accounting on/off via /proc entry a very nice method of doing things.

Question: how will the extra overhead of checking this configuration
compare with just doing it anyway?

If the code ends up as:

if (stats_enabled)
  counter++;

then you'd be better off keeping stats enabled all the time...

Obviously it'll be a bit more complex, but will the stats code be able to
remove itself completely when disabled, even at runtime??

Might be possible with IBM's dprobes, perhaps...?

> That way you can leave it off for normal run-time but when users
> complain or DBA's et al you can turn it on get some stats for a couple
> hours/days whatever, then turn it back off and plan an upgrade or
> re-create a logical volume or stripping set.

NT allows boot-time (en|dis)abling of stats; they quote a percentage for
the performance hit caused - 4%, or something like that?? Of course, they
don't say whether that's a 486 on a RAID array or a quad Xeon on IDE, so
the accuracy of that figure is a bit questionable...


James.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>