Ok, but then I don't understand why I get entries in the qsc table *only*
when using mmapfile directive.
-jeremy
>
> yeah but that's just for mmap_static.
> qsc must have features beyond mmap_static.
>
> -tcl.
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
> >
> > If you check out the mod page for mmap_static, you'll see a little `find`
> > line they note to include a lot of files within your mmapfile
> > directive. It just makes me believe that this is what they want you to do
> > to have things cached, which seems super kludgy if that's the case for
> > large sites. I can't run a huge find on all my accounts when the web
> > server comes up. That's lame. It can't be troo.
> >
> > -jeremy
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > > > overview, or should i continue reading through the actual patch?
> > > >
> > > > It seems that's the only way... perhaps you can document what you get
> > > > out of the patch? :-)
> > >
> > > haha. that thing is large. seems heavily composed of (long) and other
> > > casts for 64 bit / irix64 portability i assume, but i haven't found much
> > > beyond that...yet...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > [server-status]
> > > > You haven't included relevant parts of your apache.conf (I didn't use
> > > > the QSC, so I can't comment further).
> > >
> > > hmm, there's not much to it. i basically use sgi's defaults:
> > >
> > > <IfModule mod_mmap_static.c>
> > > QSC on
> > > </IfModule>
> > >
> > > and my configure did include --enable-module=mmap_static
> > >
> > > i've seen the mmapfile directive with mmap_static, but i was under the
> > > assumption that QSC handles caching much more automatically and
> > > dynamically. if not, what are its benefits?
> > >
> > > still baffled as to what i'm missing.
> > >
> > > -tcl.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>
--
http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------
|